Hi Linus! Please pull from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbglaw/vax-linux.git , branch `upstream-linus'. Despite the repo's name, it contains a fix for the srm_env driver on Alpha: arch/alpha/kernel/srm_env.c | 84 ++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) commit 16b7f4dcd340875625714438a812ea06400f9666 Author: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> Date: Tue Nov 7 23:50:37 2006 +0100 Update for the srm_env driver. This patch contains a fix for a bug introduced more than a year ago (not setting *eof) and updates whitespace a bit. Signed-off-by: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/srm_env.c +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/srm_env.c @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ * srm_env.c - Access to SRM environment * variables through linux' procfs * - * Copyright (C) 2001-2002 Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> + * (C) 2001,2002,2006 by Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> * * This driver is at all a modified version of Erik Mouw's * Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c, so: thank @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ * warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR * PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more * details. - * + * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public * License along with this program; if not, write to the * Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, @@ -29,33 +29,6 @@ * */ -/* - * Changelog - * ~~~~~~~~~ - * - * Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:10:43 +0200 - * - Update Config.help entry. I got a number of emails asking - * me to tell their senders if they could make use of this - * piece of code... So: "SRM is something like BIOS for your - * Alpha" - * - Update code formatting a bit to better conform CodingStyle - * rules. - * - So this is v0.0.5, with no changes (except formatting) - * - * Wed, 22 May 2002 00:11:21 +0200 - * - Fix typo on comment (SRC -> SRM) - * - Call this "Version 0.0.4" - * - * Tue, 9 Apr 2002 18:44:40 +0200 - * - Implement access by variable name and additionally - * by number. This is done by creating two subdirectories - * where one holds all names (like the old directory - * did) and the other holding 256 files named like "0", - * "1" and so on. - * - Call this "Version 0.0.3" - * - */ - #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/init.h> @@ -67,7 +40,7 @@ #include <asm/machvec.h> #define BASE_DIR "srm_environment" /* Subdir in /proc/ */ #define NAMED_DIR "named_variables" /* Subdir for known variables */ #define NUMBERED_DIR "numbered_variables" /* Subdir for all variables */ -#define VERSION "0.0.5" /* Module version */ +#define VERSION "0.0.6" /* Module version */ #define NAME "srm_env" /* Module name */ MODULE_AUTHOR("Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>"); @@ -106,7 +79,6 @@ static srm_env_t srm_named_entries[] = { static srm_env_t srm_numbered_entries[256]; - static int srm_env_read(char *page, char **start, off_t off, int count, int *eof, void *data) @@ -115,21 +87,23 @@ srm_env_read(char *page, char **start, o unsigned long ret; srm_env_t *entry; - if(off != 0) - return -EFAULT; + if (off != 0) { + *eof = 1; + return 0; + } entry = (srm_env_t *) data; ret = callback_getenv(entry->id, page, count); - if((ret >> 61) == 0) + if ((ret >> 61) == 0) { nbytes = (int) ret; - else + *eof = 1; + } else nbytes = -EFAULT; return nbytes; } - static int srm_env_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, unsigned long count, void *data) @@ -155,7 +129,7 @@ srm_env_write(struct file *file, const c ret1 = callback_setenv(entry->id, buf, count); if ((ret1 >> 61) == 0) { - do + do ret2 = callback_save_env(); while((ret2 >> 61) == 1); res = (int) ret1; @@ -172,14 +146,14 @@ srm_env_cleanup(void) srm_env_t *entry; unsigned long var_num; - if(base_dir) { + if (base_dir) { /* * Remove named entries */ - if(named_dir) { + if (named_dir) { entry = srm_named_entries; - while(entry->name != NULL && entry->id != 0) { - if(entry->proc_entry) { + while (entry->name != NULL && entry->id != 0) { + if (entry->proc_entry) { remove_proc_entry(entry->name, named_dir); entry->proc_entry = NULL; @@ -192,11 +166,11 @@ srm_env_cleanup(void) /* * Remove numbered entries */ - if(numbered_dir) { - for(var_num = 0; var_num <= 255; var_num++) { + if (numbered_dir) { + for (var_num = 0; var_num <= 255; var_num++) { entry = &srm_numbered_entries[var_num]; - if(entry->proc_entry) { + if (entry->proc_entry) { remove_proc_entry(entry->name, numbered_dir); entry->proc_entry = NULL; @@ -212,7 +186,6 @@ srm_env_cleanup(void) return; } - static int __init srm_env_init(void) { @@ -222,7 +195,7 @@ srm_env_init(void) /* * Check system */ - if(!alpha_using_srm) { + if (!alpha_using_srm) { printk(KERN_INFO "%s: This Alpha system doesn't " "know about SRM (or you've booted " "SRM->MILO->Linux, which gets " @@ -233,14 +206,14 @@ srm_env_init(void) /* * Init numbers */ - for(var_num = 0; var_num <= 255; var_num++) + for (var_num = 0; var_num <= 255; var_num++) sprintf(number[var_num], "%ld", var_num); /* * Create base directory */ base_dir = proc_mkdir(BASE_DIR, NULL); - if(base_dir == NULL) { + if (!base_dir) { printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't create base dir /proc/%s\n", BASE_DIR); goto cleanup; @@ -251,7 +224,7 @@ srm_env_init(void) * Create per-name subdirectory */ named_dir = proc_mkdir(NAMED_DIR, base_dir); - if(named_dir == NULL) { + if (!named_dir) { printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't create dir /proc/%s/%s\n", BASE_DIR, NAMED_DIR); goto cleanup; @@ -262,7 +235,7 @@ srm_env_init(void) * Create per-number subdirectory */ numbered_dir = proc_mkdir(NUMBERED_DIR, base_dir); - if(numbered_dir == NULL) { + if (!numbered_dir) { printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't create dir /proc/%s/%s\n", BASE_DIR, NUMBERED_DIR); goto cleanup; @@ -274,10 +247,10 @@ srm_env_init(void) * Create all named nodes */ entry = srm_named_entries; - while(entry->name != NULL && entry->id != 0) { + while (entry->name && entry->id) { entry->proc_entry = create_proc_entry(entry->name, 0644, named_dir); - if(entry->proc_entry == NULL) + if (!entry->proc_entry) goto cleanup; entry->proc_entry->data = (void *) entry; @@ -291,13 +264,13 @@ srm_env_init(void) /* * Create all numbered nodes */ - for(var_num = 0; var_num <= 255; var_num++) { + for (var_num = 0; var_num <= 255; var_num++) { entry = &srm_numbered_entries[var_num]; entry->name = number[var_num]; entry->proc_entry = create_proc_entry(entry->name, 0644, numbered_dir); - if(entry->proc_entry == NULL) + if (!entry->proc_entry) goto cleanup; entry->id = var_num; @@ -318,7 +291,6 @@ cleanup: return -ENOMEM; } - static void __exit srm_env_exit(void) { @@ -328,7 +300,5 @@ srm_env_exit(void) return; } - module_init(srm_env_init); module_exit(srm_env_exit); - -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Gib Dein Bestes. Dann übertriff Dich selbst! the second : -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html the second :
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PULL] Missing *eof assignment in Alpha's srm_env driver
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] Missing *eof assignment in Alpha's srm_env driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 000 of 9] md: udev notification, raid5 read improvements etc
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] Missing *eof assignment in Alpha's srm_env driver
- Index(es):
 |