OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer <[email protected]> writes:
>
>
>> The strange thing is that one time the differences were found directly
>> after copying (thus one would thing RAM is damaged, because the data was
>> probalby (I cannot tell this for sure) taken from file cache).
>> and the other time after restarting with a certainly empty file cache.
>>
>> Any ideas? I'm willing to help debugging and so on but I must admit that
>> I need someone to say me what to do :D
>>
> bit interesting. Could you send the output of diff? I'd like to see
> how it's breaking.
>
Unfortunately I don't have currently any of the corrupted files (deleted
them,..) but as soon as I'll encounter the issue again I'll send you :)
But as far as I remember there was no pattern,.. on time a small part
was replaced by 0x0's and the other time by any bytes.
Chris.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
