Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Per-CPU tasklets are equivalent to softirqs, with extra complexity and 
> overhead ontop of it :-)
> 
> so please just introduce a rebalance softirq and attach the scheduling 
> rebalance tick to it. But i'd suggest to re-test on the 4096-CPU box, 
> maybe what 'fixed' your workload was the global serialization of the 
> tasklet. With a per-CPU softirq approach we are i think back to the same 
> situation that broke your system before.

What broke the system was the disabling of interrupts over long time 
periods during load balancing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux