On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > Christoph, DECLARE_TASKLET that you had atleast needs to be per cpu.. > Not sure if there are any other concerns. Nope. Tasklets scheduled and executed per cpu. These are the former bottom halves. See tasklet_schedule in kernel/softirq.c - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- References:
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] make last_inode counter in new_inode 32-bit on kernels that offer x86 compatability
- Next by Date: Re: PCI card not detected on Intel 845G chipset
- Previous by thread: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by thread: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
- Index(es):
 |