On Tuesday 07 November 2006 13:55, Avi Kivity wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c > >> =================================================================== > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c > >> @@ -0,0 +1,1370 @@ > >> +/********************************************************************** > >>******** + * x86_emulate.c > >> + * > >> + * Generic x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) instruction decoder and emulator. > >> + * > >> + * Copyright (c) 2005 Keir Fraser > >> + * > >> + * Linux coding style, mod r/m decoder, segment base fixes, real-mode > >> + * privieged instructions: > >> + * > >> + * Copyright (C) 2006 Qumranet > >> + * > >> + * Avi Kivity <[email protected]> > >> + * Yaniv Kamay <[email protected]> > >> + * > >> + * From: xen-unstable 10676:af9809f51f81a3c43f276f00c81a52ef558afda4 > >> + */ > > > > This needs GPL, I'd say. > > Pavel > > The entire patchset is GPL'ed. Do you mean to make it explicit? If so, > how? I'd rather not copy the entire license into each file. > > Doesn't ../../COPYING cover it, presuming it's accepted? I think Pavel references to these lines... /* * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA */ You should at least add a line like "This file is licensed under the terms of the GPL v2 license (or any later version).". -- Regards, Chris
Attachment:
pgpVNYDjzlciS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- From: David Bristow <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- References:
- [PATCH 0/14] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v4)
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/14] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v4)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator
- Index(es):
 |