Re: ZONE_NORMAL memory exhausted by 4000 TCP sockets

[Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>]

Zhao Xiaoming wrote:
> The latest update:
>     It seems that Linux kernel memory management mechanisms including
> buddy and slab algorisms are not very efficient under my test
> conditions that tcp stack requires a lot of (hundreds of MB) packet
> buffers and release them very frequently.
>     Here is the proof. After change my kernel configuration to support
> 2/2 VM splition, LOMEM consumption reduced to 270M bytes compared with
> 640M bytes of the 1/3 kernel. All test conditions are the same and
> memory pages allocated by TCP stack are also the same, 34K ~ 38K
> pages. In other words, 'lost' memory changed from ~500M to ~130M.
> Thus, I have nothing to do but guessing the much more free pages make
> the slab/buddy algorisms more efficient and waste less memory.

I kind of agree, and always compile for a 2G/2G VM split, as this also seems 
to affect certain OOM conditions positively.

What isn't quite clear though, why is the 2G/2G VM split not the default?


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/