Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree

* [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> +DECLARE_TASKLET(rebalance, &rebalance_domains, 0L);

i'm not sure i get the point of this whole do-rebalance-in-tasklet idea. 
A tasklet is global to the system. The rebalance tick was per-CPU. This 
is not an equivalent change at all. What am i missing?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15
• Next by Date: default base page size on ia64 processor
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/mca_53c9x.c : save_flags()/cli() removal
• Next by thread: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]