Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree

* [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> +DECLARE_TASKLET(rebalance, &rebalance_domains, 0L);

i'm not sure i get the point of this whole do-rebalance-in-tasklet idea. 
A tasklet is global to the system. The rebalance tick was per-CPU. This 
is not an equivalent change at all. What am i missing?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15
Next by Date: default base page size on ia64 processor
Previous by thread: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/mca_53c9x.c : save_flags()/cli() removal
Next by thread: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]