Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:15:27PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> I agree with the conclusion, but the patch is incomplete. You went down
>>> all the way to find out what the fileystems do in this messages, so add
>>> the hunks to override the defaults for non-standard filesystems to the
>>> patch aswell to restore the pre-inode diet state.
>> Well, agreed. I put 80% or more back to pre-patch state, but not all.
>> :) So it's less broken with my patch than without, so at least it's
>> moving forward. So... Ted's patches get in w/o fixing up all the other
>> filesystems (left as an exercise to the patch reader) but mine can't? :)
>
> It's because no reviwer noticed the breakage Ted put in ;-) I think if
> you really refused to do the remaining 20% we can try to pressured Ted to
> do it and if that doesn't work I'll just do it myself because I'll be
> tired of arguing at that point..
eh, I'll sign up to do it when I get a moment, I won't refuse :)
Just had to notice that 2 patches already went in without the
requirement to "fix everything else" :)
It would be nice to get the "fix most of it" patch in sooner than later,
though.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
