Re: [patch] Regression in 2.6.19-rc microcode driver

Andrew Morton wrote:

Can we fix this by switching to late_initcall() or something like that?


after testing this: the answer is "no." ;(

at least not without significant redesign on how this all interacts(which includes cpuhotplug meeting sysfs which isn't all that prettyalready) which is imo not a 2.6.19 thing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch] Regression in 2.6.19-rc microcode driver
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Regression in 2.6.19-rc microcode driver
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Re:[2.6.19-rc4] "possible recursive locking detected" in reiserfs_xattr_set
Next by Date: [PATCH update7] drivers: add LCD support
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Regression in 2.6.19-rc microcode driver
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Regression in 2.6.19-rc microcode driver
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]