Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup

On 11/6/06, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:

On 11/6/06, Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <[email protected]> wrote:
> whitespace cleanup for mm/slab.c

[snip]

> -       addr = (unsigned long *)&((char *)addr)[obj_offset(cachep)];
> +       addr = (unsigned long *)((char *)addr + obj_offset(cachep));

Call me old-fashioned, but this doesn't count as whitespace cleanup.
Anyway, why do you want to do this? The coding style changes seem too
minor to be worth it...

                               Pekka

Isn't "p+i" more correct / easy to understand than "&p[i]"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup
    • From: Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/1] nfsd4: reindent do_open_lookup()
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.18.2: lockdep warnings on rmmod ohci_hcd
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup
• Next by thread: Re: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]