Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 06 2006, Brent Baccala wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Nov 03 2006, Brent Baccala wrote:
> >>
> >>Does 7 microseconds seem a bit excessive for an io_submit (and a
> >>gettimeofday)?
> >
> >I guess you mean miliseconds, not microseconds. 7 miliseconds seems way
> >too long. I repeated your test here, and the 100 submits take 97000
> >microseconds here - or 97 miliseconds. So that's a little less than 1
> >msec per io_submit. Still pretty big. You can experiment with oprofile
> >to profile where the kernel spends its time in that period.
> >
> >-- 
> >Jens Axboe
> >
> 
> Yes, of course, milliseconds.  I have enough other problems with this
> program (measured in minutes, and no mistake that) that I doubt I'll
> be profiling the kernel any time soon, but thank you for your help.
> 
> More than anything else, you've made me understand that I can't just
> fire off a bunch of async requests like I'm tossing peanuts across the
> table.  I've really got to pay attention to what's in that kernel
> queue and how it gets managed.

Yeah, I'm afraid so. We really should be returning EAGAIN or something
like that for the congested condition, though.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux