* Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just reproduced it running glibc make check. I had just enabled
> kprobes and recompiled with the stock SuSE-10.1 compiler while waiting
> for you to send me your .config (nevermind that request) so I could
> try to reproduce it here.
hm, so kprobe_flush_task() is likely PREEMPT_RT-unsafe.
could you try the patch below, does it help? (a quick review seems to
suggest that all codepaths protected by kretprobe_lock are atomic)
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static struct hlist_head kretprobe_inst_
static atomic_t kprobe_count;
DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex); /* Protects kprobe_table */
-DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kretprobe_lock); /* Protects kretprobe_inst_table */
+DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(kretprobe_lock); /* Protects kretprobe_inst_table */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, kprobe_instance) = NULL;
static struct notifier_block kprobe_page_fault_nb = {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
