PATCH? hrtimer_wakeup: fix a theoretical race wrt rt_mutex_slowlock()

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>]

When task->array != NULL, try_to_wake_up() just goes to "out_running" and sets
task->state = TASK_RUNNING.

In that case hrtimer_wakeup() does:

	timeout->task = NULL;		<----- [1]

	spin_lock(runqueues->lock);

	task->state = TASK_RUNNING;	<----- [2]

from Documentation/memory-barriers.txt

	Memory operations that occur before a LOCK operation may appear to
	happen after it completes.

This means that [2] may be completed before [1], and

CPU_0							CPU_1
rt_mutex_slowlock:

for (;;) {
	...
		if (timeout && !timeout->task)
			return -ETIMEDOUT;
	...

	schedule();
							hrtimer_wakeup() sets
	...						task->state = TASK_RUNNING,
							but "timeout->task = NULL"
							is not completed
	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
}

we can miss a timeout.

Of course, this all is scholasticism, this can't happen in practice, but
may be this patch makes sense as a documentation update.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- STATS/kernel/hrtimer.c~1_hrtw	2006-10-22 18:24:03.000000000 +0400
+++ STATS/kernel/hrtimer.c	2006-11-05 22:32:36.000000000 +0300
@@ -662,9 +662,12 @@ static int hrtimer_wakeup(struct hrtimer
 		container_of(timer, struct hrtimer_sleeper, timer);
 	struct task_struct *task = t->task;
 
-	t->task = NULL;
-	if (task)
+	if (task) {
+		t->task = NULL;
+		/* must be visible before task->state = TASK_RUNNING */
+		smp_wmb();
 		wake_up_process(task);
+	}
 
 	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 }

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/