Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 01:50 -0500 schrieb Trond Myklebust:
> > --- linux-2.6.18/net/sunrpc/sched.c 2006-09-20 05:42:06.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux/net/sunrpc/sched.c 2006-11-04 20:38:56.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -302,12 +302,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rpc_wait_for_completion_
> > */
> > static void rpc_make_runnable(struct rpc_task *task)
> > {
> > - int do_ret;
> > -
> > BUG_ON(task->tk_timeout_fn);
> > - do_ret = rpc_test_and_set_running(task);
> > rpc_clear_queued(task);
> > - if (do_ret)
> > + if (rpc_test_and_set_running(task))
> > return;
> > if (RPC_IS_ASYNC(task)) {
> > int status;
>
> This fix looks wrong to me. If we've made it to 'rpc_make_runnable',
> then the rpc_task will have already been removed from the
> rpc_wait_queue.
I just flipped the two lines, changed nothing else. Why exactly do you
think that's wrong, I don't see anything particular that could be broken
by chaning the ordering. Anyway, the fsstress has been running for 18
hours straight now without showing any signs of problems.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
