Re: [rfc patch] i386: don't save eflags on task switch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
For me, when compiled with -O2, it results in

	84
	88
	132

which basically says: a "rdtsc->rdtsc" is 84 cycles, putting a "pushfl" in between is another _4_ cycles, and putting a "popfl" in between is about another 48 cycles.

This means we should definitely change restore_flags() to only STI, never popf

sti is expensive as well; iirc just as expensive on most processors as popf, although I don't have hard numbers to back this up on hand. An _unlikely_ jcc + popf? is better than a sti, for sure, but a likely jcc+popf could cost more than a jcc+sti, depending on model.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux