Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors

> Can you work based on something like this instead?
> 
> (Totally untested, I just did this as an example of what I think is a lot 
> more maintainable)

Yup, that would definitely work for me.

I'll do the same for the repeat ops..

Thanks,
Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
• Next by Date: Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
• Previous by thread: Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
• Next by thread: Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]