why not create one standard update function. and use that us default for cfg->update YH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] htirq: Allow buggy drivers of buggy hardware to write the registers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] htirq: Allow buggy drivers of buggy hardware to write the registers.
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/2] htirq: generalization
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH 1/2] htirq: Refactor so we only have one function that writes to the chip.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [RFC][PATCH 2/2] htirq: Allow buggy drivers of buggy hardware to write the registers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [RFC][PATCH 0/2] htirq: generalization
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] i386: remove IOPL check on task switch
- Next by Date: Re: New filesystem for Linux
- Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] htirq: Allow buggy drivers of buggy hardware to write the registers.
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] htirq: Allow buggy drivers of buggy hardware to write the registers.
- Index(es):
 |