Andrew wrote:
> But in this application which you are proposing, any correlation with
> elapsed walltime is very slight. It's just the wrong baseline to use.
> What is the *sense* in it?
Ah - but time is cheap as dirt, and scales like the common cold virus.
That makes it sinfully attractive for secondary affect placement cache
hints like this.
What else would you suggest?
Same question applies, I suppose, to my zonelist caching patch that is
sitting in your *-mm patch stack, where you also had doubts about using
wall clock time to decay the fullnode hints.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
