Re: New filesystem for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Oleg Verych wrote:

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
In gmane.linux.kernel, you wrote:
[]
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

As Mikulas points out, (1 << anything) won't be evaluating to zero.

How about integer overflow ?

C standard defines that shifts by more bits than size of a type are
undefined (in fact 1<<32 produces 1 on i386, because processor uses only 5
bits of a count).
,--
|#include <stdio.h>
|int main(void) {
|	unsigned int b = 1;
|
|	printf("%u\n", (1 << 33));
|	printf("%u\n", (b << 33));
|	return 0;
|}
|$ gcc bit.c && ./a.out
`--

There *is* difference, isn't it?

The standard says that the result is undefined, so the compiler is standard-compliant. It could have returned any numbers and still be correct.

Mikulas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux