> So unless there is some other array that is sized by NR_IRQs
> in the context switch path which could account for this in
> other ways. It looks like you just got unlucky.
TLB/cache profiling data might be useful?
My bet would be more on cache effects.
> The only hypothesis that I can seem to come up with is that maybe
> you are getting an extra tlb now that you didn't use to.
> I think the per cpu area is covered by huge pages but maybe not.
It should be.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
