Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions

On 11/3/06, Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:

Why? What is so special about the details that you need to hide them?
This is a union that will always be part of a structure anyway.

Nothing. Josef, I think we should make them unions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] fsstack updates
    • From: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
    • From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
    • From: Mark Williamson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
    • From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: x86_64 slowdown in lmbench's fork
• Next by Date: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fsstack: Generic get/set lower object functions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]