On Monday 30 October 2006 09:22, Dave Neuer wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Dave Neuer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something, (well actually I'm sure I'm missing
> > somethng). Looking at the code again, it's unclear to me why there is
> > even a call to the ISR in i8042_aux_write, since the latter function
> > already calls i8042_read_data.
> >
>
> Whoops, sorry. I meant i8042_command, which is called by
> i8042_aux_write before the call to i8042_interrupt, already calls
> i8042_read_data.
>
It only calls i8042_read_data() if command is supposed to return data.
Neither I8042_CMD_AUX_SEND nor I8042_CMD_MUX_SEND wait fotr data to come
back.
Anyway, I removed call to i8042_interrupt() from i8042_aux_write() because
it is indeed unnecessary.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
