Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:26, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Ji Rafael,
> 
> > On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:56, you wrote:
> > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18
> > > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
> > 
> > Can we please add the following two to the list of known regressions:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7207
> > 
> > They are regressions with respect to 2.6.17.x kernels, but still.
> >...
> 
> I'm sorry, but I'm only tracking regressions since 2.6.18 - "regressions 
> since the latest stable kernel" is a clear border, and the number of 
> post-2.6.18 regressions is high enough that adding even more 
> regressions to my list wouldn't make sense.

Fair enough.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
		R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux