Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>]

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Can we please add the following two to the list of known regressions:
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082

Ok, I think I'll just revert it.

Decoding the PCI IO range is fine - even if a driver has detached, the 
kernel knows where the PCI devices are, and won't re-use the range. So 
while the patch that triggers the problem seems valid in itself, it's 
probably not worth the pain to apply it at this point. So I think I'll 
revert it - the rationale for the patch was fairly weak.

Greg, or would you prefer to do the honors?

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7207

This one is apparently purely an e1000 driver problem. Can't help you with 
that one. Although I find it suspicious that the "e1000_resume()" path 
doesn't seem to be calling "e1000_power_up_phy()" before e1000_up().

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/