On Thu, Nov 02 2006, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:11:50PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 01 2006, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> > > + {0x3211103C, "Smart Array E200i", &SA5_access, 120},
> >
> > Is it 120, or 128? And how big is the allocated command array now, with
> > 512 commands?
>
> The controller can handle up to 128, but I artificially limited it to 120
> for reasons I shouldn't discuss in public. :)
:-)
> Each command is 548 bytes w/o scatter gather chaining. So 548 * 512 = 280576
> bytes for the command list. We've tested using 1024 commands with several
> Smart Array controllers and have not encountered issues. The reason for the
> increase is performance. The busier you can keep the controller the better
> it works.
So this:
hba[i]->cmd_pool = (CommandList_struct *)
pci_alloc_consistent(hba[i]->pdev,
NR_CMDS * sizeof(CommandList_struct),
&(hba[i]->cmd_pool_dhandle));
is getting pretty huge then (it was already, actually).
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
