Re: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Conke Hu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers
From: Martin Waitz <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:15:23 +0100
Cc: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: Conke Hu <[email protected]>, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

hoi :)

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:39:23PM +0800, Conke Hu wrote:
> But who should be the "Signed-off-by" man when I create a patch and ready for sending it to kernel org?

yourself.

Please look into Documentation/SubmittingPatches paragraph 11.

-- 
Martin Waitz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- RE: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers
  - From: "Conke Hu" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [patch 2/6] Add display output class support
Next by Date: [patch 3/6] backlight and output sysfs support for acpi video driver
Previous by thread: RE: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux