Re: [PATCH 01/02] Elf: Always define elf_addr_t in linux/elf.h

On 11/2/06, Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 07:19:42PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> --- 0001/include/linux/elf.h
> +++ work/include/linux/elf.h  2006-11-02 15:44:10.000000000 +0900
> @@ -352,12 +352,16 @@ typedef struct elf64_note {
>    Elf64_Word n_type; /* Content type */
>  } Elf64_Nhdr;
>
> +typedef Elf64_Off elf64_addr;
> +typedef Elf32_Off elf32_addr;
> +

What are these typedefs useful for?  Isn't it better just to
use Elf32_Addr and Elf64_Addr in the #defines below?

Sure, good idea. I just added them to follow the "style" of the rest
of the file.

Thanks,

/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 01/02] Elf: Always define elf_addr_t in linux/elf.h
    • From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/02] Elf: Always define elf_addr_t in linux/elf.h
    • From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] bdev: fix ->bd_part_count leak
• Next by Date: RE: Can Linux live without DMA zone?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/02] Elf: Always define elf_addr_t in linux/elf.h
• Next by thread: ALSA message with 2.6.19-rc4-mm2 (not -mm1)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]