Re: [PATCH 0/2] taskstats: uglify^Woptimize reply assembling

* Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> 2006-11-01 21:25
> Thomas, we are doing genlmsg_cancel() before nlmsg_free(), this is
> not necessary. Unless you have evil plans to complicate genetlink
> we can remove a little bit of code, what do you think?

genlmsg_cancel() is only required in error paths for dumping
procedures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] taskstats: uglify^Woptimize reply assembling
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Problems with /proc/mounts and statvfs (implementing df).
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Allow selected bug checks to be skipped by paravirt kernels
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] taskstats: uglify^Woptimize reply assembling
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] taskstats: factor out reply assembling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]