RE: Can Linux live without DMA zone?

["Conke Hu" <conke.hu@amd.com>]

It seems a good idea.
Is dma zone is still necessay on most modern computers?

Best regards,
Conke @ AMD, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jun Sun
Sent: 2006年11月2日 10:16
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Can Linux live without DMA zone?


I am trying to reserve a block of memory (>16MB) starting from 0 and hide it 
from kernel.  A consequence is that DMA zone now has size 0.  That causes
many drivers to grief (OOMs).

I see two ways out:

1. Modify individual drivers and convince them not to alloc with GFP_DMA.
   I have been trying to do this but do not seem to see an end of it.  :)

2. Simply lie and increase MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to really big (like 1GB) so that
   the whole memory region belongs to DMA zone.

#2 sounds pretty hackish.  I am sure something bad will happen
sooner or later (like what?). But so far it appears to be working fine.

The fundamental question is: Has anybody tried to run Linux without 0 sized
DMA zone before?  Am I doing something that nobody has done before (which is
something really hard to believe these days with Linux :P)?

Cheers.

Jun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/