Re: [PATCH] Updated, add get_range, allows a hyhpenated range to get_options

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

Derek Fults wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:52 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Derek Fults wrote:
> > > This allows a hyphenated range of positive numbers M-N, in the string
> > > passed to command line helper function, get_options.  This will expand
> > > the range and insert the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in
> > > get_options.
> > >
> > > Currently the command line option "isolcpus=" takes as its argument a
> > > list of cpus.  
> > > Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>
> > > This can get extremely long when isolating the majority of cpus on a
> > > large system.  Valid values of <cpu_number>  include all cpus, 0 to
> > > "number of CPUs in system - 1".
> > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Derek Fults <dfults@sgi.com>  
> > >
> > > Index: linux/lib/cmdline.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/lib/cmdline.c	2006-09-19 22:42:06.000000000 -0500
> > > +++ linux/lib/cmdline.c	2006-11-01 12:36:20.059166727 -0600
> > > @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >  #include <linux/string.h>
> > >  
> > > +/**
> > > + *	If a hyphen was found in get_option, this will handle the
> > > + *	range of numbers, M-N.  This will expand the range and insert
> > > + *	the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options.
> > > + */
> > Derek,
> > Thanks for persisting thru this.  It's all fine for me except the
> > comment block above.  If a comment block begins with "/**", then
> > it's supposed to be in kernel-doc format (see
> > Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt), with function name &
> > parameters (if applicable).  However, that mostly needs to be done
> > for non-static functions, so probably just change /** to /*
> > and leave the rest of the comment block as is.
> > My other comment-block comment was also about kernel long-comment
> > style, which is
> > /*
> >  * begin
> >  * more
> >  * end
> >  */
> > so now you have achieved that also, so thanks again.
>
> I fixed both comments to match that format.  Thanks for all the help and
> your patience.
> I'm posting the new patch in this replay.  Is that an acceptable
> practice, or does one normally post all fixes to a patch in a new
> message?

It happens both ways, but since this is mostly new code/feature,
I suggest that you repost it and also cc: akpm@osdl.org on it.

And it still needs a user.  Will you be converting isolcpus=
to use this functionality?
It likely won't be merged until it has a user.

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/