On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:57:02AM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: > Do you have some hints on the quirks which could be good candidates? I do not, sorry. Good luck. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- From: "Sylvain Bertrand" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- From: "Sylvain Bertrand" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- From: "Sylvain Bertrand" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] swsusp: Freeze filesystems during suspend (rev. 2)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised again
- Previous by thread: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7437] New: VIA VT8233 seems to suffer from the via latency quirk
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/9] Char: sx, lock boards struct
- Index(es):
 |