On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:01AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > >> 3. Configfs may be easily implemented later as an additional
> > >> interface. I propose the following solution:
> > >
> > > Ideally we should have one interface - either syscall or configfs - and
> > > not both.
>
> To incorporate all feedback perhaps we should replace "configfs" with
> "filesystem".
Yes, you are right.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
