On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:26 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > With the battery class driver, how would that be conveyed? Would the > sysfs file be deleted in this case, or would the value of the sysfs > key be something like "<invalid>". I'd be inclined to make the read return -EINVAL. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- References:
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: "Shem Multinymous" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: "Jean Delvare" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: "Shem Multinymous" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: Xavier Bestel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: "Shem Multinymous" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- From: Richard Hughes <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc <-> ThinkPads
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH] dont insert sockets/pipes dentries into dentry_hashtable.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: Battery class driver.
- Index(es):
 |