On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Paul Menage won't agree. He believes that interface must come first.
> I also remind you that the latest beancounter patch provides all the
> stuff we're discussing. It may move tasks, limit all three resources
> discussed, reclaim memory and so on. And configfs interface could be
> attached easily.
>
There's really two different interfaces: those to the controller and those
to the container. While the configfs (or simpler fs implementation solely
for our purposes) is the most logical because of its inherent hierarchial
nature, it seems like the only criticism on that has come from UBC. From
my understanding of beancounter, it could be implemented on top of any
such container abstraction anyway.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
