Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix

Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:

This patch fixes kzalloc parameters (GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL)

Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[email protected]>

applied to #upstream-fixes

In the future, please include a description of -why- patches like this are needed (I got the info from your replies in this case)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix
    • From: Jan-Bernd Themann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX_FD
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] n2: fix confusing error code
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 2/2] ehea: 64K page support fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]