On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:51:33 EST, Dave Jones said: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:34:23AM -0800, Ray Lee wrote: > > On 10/31/06, Martin J. Bligh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just > > > > because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones. > > > > > > Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the > > > uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ? > > > > What would be useful in the short term is a tool that shows only the > > new warnings that didn't exist in the last point release. > > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/remapper.git As somebody proves me wrong on the fact it's not easy. Of course, it's Al's git tree, which is probably saying something. :)
Attachment:
pgpRxE4AYiX5G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- References:
- Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] init_reap_node() initialization fix
- Next by Date: 2.6.19-rc[1-4]: boot fail with (lapic && on_battery)
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
- Index(es):
 |