Quoting r. Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>:
> Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)
>
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> >
> > Please revert the patch. I'll fix the wrong error handling.
> >
> > I'm not sure reverting the patch solves the ACPI problem
> > because Michael's kernel seems not having any user of
> > bd_claim_by_kobject.
>
> Yeah, doing a grep does seem to imply that there is no way that those
> changes could matter.
>
> Michael, can you double-check? I think Jun'ichi is right - in your kernel,
> according to the config posted on bugzilla, I don't think there should be
> a single caller of bd_claim_by_disk, since CONFIG_MD is disabled.
I double-checked, and of course you are right - the issues resurfaced after some
more use, even with the patch reverted. I've written some scripts that do some
compiles from scratch, and suspend/resume several times. Plan to try bi-secting
with that and see what that will come up with.
OTOH, from the discussion it seems just randomly pointing a finger at a patch
has uncovered some bugs - so maybe we should do this a bit more :)
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
