On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:37:37 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > irq = -ENOSPC;
> > > > + vector = 0;
> > >
> > > NAK - the code is fine, and this is fixed in Jeff's gcc-warnings
> > tree
> > > via annotation.
> >
> > err, what gcc-warnings tree?
> >
> > git
> > +ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git#gccbug
> > just does lots of initialise-to-zero thingies, doesn't have any
> > special
> > annotation and doesn't fix io_apic.c.
>
> this is an initialize-to-zero annotation for a false-positive gcc
> warning. If it's not in Jeff tree yet then it should be there ...
>
hm, I wouldn't call that "annotation".
Now, the
#define SHUT_GCC_UP(x) = x
...
int foo SHUT_GCC_UP(foo);
...
(or whatever it was) trick was "annotation". A good way of doing it too, IMO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
