Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] md: Change lifetime rules for 'md' devices.

[Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>]

On Tue, Oct 31 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday October 31, jens.axboe@oracle.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm guessing we need
> > > 
> > > diff .prev/block/elevator.c ./block/elevator.c
> > > --- .prev/block/elevator.c	2006-10-31 20:06:22.000000000 +1100
> > > +++ ./block/elevator.c	2006-10-31 20:06:40.000000000 +1100
> > > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static void __elv_unregister_queue(eleva
> > >  
> > >  void elv_unregister_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (q)
> > > +	if (q && q->elevator)
> > >  		__elv_unregister_queue(q->elevator);
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jens?  md never registers and elevator for its queue.
> > 
> > Hmm, but blk_unregister_queue() doesn't call elv_unregister_queue()
> > unless q->request_fn is set. And in that case, you must have an io
> > scheduler attached.
> 
> Hmm.. yes.  Oh, I get it.  I have
> 
> 	blk_cleanup_queue(mddev->queue);
> 	mddev->queue = NULL;
> 	del_gendisk(mddev->gendisk);
> 	mddev->gendisk = NULL;
> 
> That's the wrong order, isn't it. :-(

Yep, you want to reverse that :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/