Re: [PATCH] Allow a larger buffer for writes to cpuset files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Paul Jackson" <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow a larger buffer for writes to cpuset files
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:15:11 -0800
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: <20061030200053.f9836cce.pj@sgi.com>
References: <6599ad830610301838i65a00d85g82647435ea4581a4@mail.gmail.com> <20061030200053.f9836cce.pj@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 10/30/06, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:

How about coding for the possibility that either NR_CPUS or MAX_NUMNODES
is larger, and removing 'cpu' from the comment:

        /* Crude upper limit on largest legitimate list user might write. */
        if (nbytes > 100 + 6 * max(NR_CPUS, MAX_NUMNODES))

Yes, that does seem like a better idea.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Allow a larger buffer for writes to cpuset files
  - From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Allow a larger buffer for writes to cpuset files
  - From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] auth_gss: unregister gss_domain when unloading module
Next by Date: Re: [rfc] [patch] mm: Slab - Eliminate lock_cpu_hotplug from slab
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Allow a larger buffer for writes to cpuset files
Next by thread: Suspend to disk: do we HAVE to use swap?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux