Re: [PATCH] sched.c : correct comment for this_rq_lock() routine

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> 
> Correct the comment for the this_rq_lock() routine.
> 

You submitted this same patch two days ago.

		http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/28/54
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched.c : correct comment for this_rq_lock() routine
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched.c : correct comment for this_rq_lock() routine
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: splice blocks indefinitely when len > 64k?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] vmalloc : optimization, cleanup, bugfixes
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] sched.c : correct comment for this_rq_lock() routine
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched.c : correct comment for this_rq_lock() routine
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]