Hi Linus,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Actually, looking closer at the code, the patch seems to add _incorrect_
error handling.
For example, look at bd_claim_by_kobject(): if the "bd_claim()" inside of
it succeeds, we used to always return success. Now, we don't necessarily
do that: we may have done a _successful_ "bd_claim()" call, but then we
return an error because something else failed, and now we're returning
with from bd_claim_by_kobject() with the bd_claim() done, but with an
error return (so the caller will _not_ call "bd_release()", and the
block_device will forever stay exclusive).
No?
You're right.
Now, exactly why acpi stops working as a result, I don't know, but maybe
something else tries to get exclusive access to a swap partition, for
example, and now fails, causing some acpi sequence to not be set up?
Dunno.
So I suspect it should be reverted, but maybe somebody can see exactly
what goes wrong here.
Please revert the patch. I'll fix the wrong error handling.
I'm not sure reverting the patch solves the ACPI problem
because Michael's kernel seems not having any user of
bd_claim_by_kobject.
Thanks,
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation of America
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
