Re: [PATCH 3/7] More generic paravirtualization entry point.

On Saturday 28 October 2006 00:00, Chris Wright wrote:

> +
> +/* We simply declare start_kernel to be the paravirt probe of last resort.
> */ +asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void);

Didn't rusty put that into a header recently?

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] x86 paravirtualization infrastructure
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 3/7] More generic paravirtualization entry point.
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Add APIC accessors to paravirt-ops.
• Next by Date: Re: More uml build failures on 2.16.19-rc3 and 2.6.18.1
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/7] More generic paravirtualization entry point.
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/7] header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]