On Sat 2006-10-28 15:48:54, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 18:52 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > This is ugly, and unneccessary: kernel is centrally controlled. We
> > *will* want to merge such attributes into something standard.
>
> Uh, such standards don't happen overnight as this thread painfully
> demonstrates, i.e. there is not yet any "standard" for handling
> batteries until dwmw2 actually stepped up. That alone says something.
> And we're at 2.6.19 about 15 years into development of Linux?
And we have sys_open. Not sys_x_ext2_open.
> You may or may not like it... but battery class drivers will have such
> non-standard things. I'm merely suggesting to tag these as non-standard
> so it's bloody evident they are non-standard. For the record, I also
> think that making non standard attributes ugly will help accelerate us
> in standardizing on it. You can also easier grep through the sources to
> find offending code when you do decide to standardize it.
You can simply _not merge offending code in the first place_.
"Lets design it so that stupid things can be grepped for" is stupid,
when we can simply "not allow stupid things to be merged".
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
