it seems odd that the purpose of the "probe_kernel_address()" macro
is, in fact, to probe a *user* address (from linux/uaccess.h):
#define probe_kernel_address(addr, retval) \
({ \
long ret; \
\
inc_preempt_count(); \
ret = __get_user(retval, addr); \
dec_preempt_count(); \
ret; \
})
given that that routine is referenced only 5 places in the entire
source tree, wouldn't it be more meaningful to use a more appropriate
name?
pedantically yours,
rday
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]