On Fri, Oct 27, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Gwe, 2006-10-27 am 11:42 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
> > IOW, we want to be multithreaded _within_ an initcall level, but not between
> > different levels.
>
> Thats actually insufficient. We have link ordered init sequences in
> large numbers of driver subtrees (ATA, watchdog, etc). We'll need
> several more initcall layers to fix that.
Is it time for something better?
True dependencies, an addition to or as replacement for module_init()?
random example: hfs/super.c:
depends_on_initialized(init_hfs_fs: init_hfsplus_fs,kmem_cache_thingie,core_filesystem_thingie,foo,bar,worldpeace);
If init_hfsplus_fs() does not exist it should be no error.
Whatever the sytax will be and however its parsed during build, that link order
requirement bites every other month.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
