Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Gwe, 2006-10-27 am 18:56 -0400, ysgrifennodd Florin Malita:
Also, since driverloader is not GPL-compatible (MODULE_LICENSE("see
LICENSE file; Copyright (c)2003-2004 Linuxant inc.")), that check is
redundant. How about removing it (applies on top of Randy's patch)?


Signed-off-by: Florin Malita <[email protected]>

NAK

Older versions of Linuxant's driverloader claim GPL\0some other text and
systematically set out to abuse the license tag code. We should continue
to carry the code for this.

Alan

I'm confused.  Do you mean that we should continue to treate driverloader
as GPL?  Oh, I guess I see.  You mean that we should continue to have
special code to override their "GPL\0other text" license.  OK.

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux