Based on some rather off-the cuff bench marking I've done I get around
a 5 to 10% performance improve over the stock 2.6.18.1 performance. As
the saying goes, there are lies, damn lies, and bench marks, so YMMV.
On 10/26/06, Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
Holden Karau wrote:
> From: Holden Karau <[email protected]> http://www.holdenkarau.com
>
> This is an attempt at improving fat_mirror_bhs in sync mode [namely it
> writes all of the data for a backup block, and then blocks untill
> finished]. The old behaviour would write & block in smaller chunks, so
> this should be slightly faster. It also removes the fixme requesting
> that it be fixed to behave this way :-)
> Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <[email protected]> http://www.holdenkarau.com
So how much is performance improved?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
--
Cell: 613-276-1645
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]