Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >
> i've found:
> 
> __create_workqueue
> queue_work


if you change the queue_work() calls to schedule_work() (and drop it's
first argument) and just remove the create_workqueue() entirely, does it
work then? (probably also need to remove destroy_workqueue() call)
if so, that's the real solution on the ndiswrapper side...


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux