Vasily Averin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Vasily Averin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Therefore I believe that my patch is optimal solution.
> > I'm not sure that prune_dcache() is particularly optimal.
>
> I means that my patch is optimal for problem in subject.
I didn't say it wasn't.
> I would like to ask you to approve it and we will go to next issue.
I did ack it didn't I? I must fix my mail client so that it doesn't
automatically remove my email address from the To/Cc fields when I'm replying
to a message:-/
> We have seen that umount (and remount) can work very slowly, it was cycled
> inside shrink_dcache_sb() up to several hours with taken s_umount semaphore.
umount at least should be fixed as that should no longer use
shrink_dcache_sb().
> We are trying to resolve this issue by using per-sb lru list. I'm preparing
> the patch for 2.6.19-rc3 right now and going to send it soon.
That sounds tricky; you have to check all your LRU lists to find the LRU
dentry.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
